Accelerate Your Business
The Number One Resource for Innovative Solutions
 
CyberInI, LLC.
NSF Enables Pakistan to Connect Globally through 155 mbps TransPAC2 high speed link
NSF Enables Pakistan to Connect to Global Research Community through New High Speed Link

Cooperation between NSF, Pakistan and EU-funded TEIN2 program delivers connectivity to enable global collaboration

Map showing connection between PERN/PERN2 point in Pakistan and TEIN landing point in Singapore.

Connection between PERN/PERN2 point in Pakistan and TEIN landing point in Singapore.

October 28, 2008

The National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Pakistan Higher Education Commission (HEC) applaud the creation of a functional U.S.-Pakistan network connection. This connection was "inaugurated" last week during the Internet2 Emerging National Research and Education Networks ("NREN") session at the Fall Internet2 meeting in New Orleans.

Representatives from the HEC in Pakistan participated in the meeting via a 155Mbps connection from Islamabad to the TEIN2 network, the NSF- funded TransPAC2 network, and the Internet2 network. The virtual participants from Pakistan were joined by virtual participants from Trinidad and Tobago, Egypt, India, Ecuador, Chile and Sweden.

"This represents a major milestone in the development of physical network connectivity between Pakistan and the global scientific community," said Arden L. Bement, Jr., director of the National Science Foundation. "I applaud the diligent and sustained efforts of technologists and governments in the U.S., Europe and Pakistan needed to make this vision a reality. Now we must continue those efforts toward our true goal of enhancing global research and education collaborations."

This network connection represents a unique cooperation between the United States, Pakistan and the European Commission (EC). The physical network connection between Karachi and Singapore was co-funded by the US-NSF and the Pakistan-HEC. In Singapore the network connects to the TEIN2 point of presence and via the EC funded TEIN2 network and the NSF-funded TransPAC2 project—led by Indiana University—to the global research and education network.

"Europe is delighted that Pakistan's scientists and academics are now connected to the global research and education community thanks to this new link," said Viviane Reding, European commissioner for Information Society and Media. "This is an excellent model for co-operation between the United States and European programs, which I hope we can build on in the future."

The introduction of high speed connectivity between the two countries was one stated objective that emerged from a Feb. 13-14, 2007, U.S.-Pakistan Joint Committee Meeting on Science and Technology co-chaired by Bement in Washington, D.C. Other proposed collaborative activities are outlined in the meeting's public report, which may be found at: http://www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/or/82287.htm.

This new network connection will enable Pakistani scientists from 60 universities and institutes, linked via the Pakistan Education Research Network (PERN), to work with their international peers on research projects that require fast data transfers to share information across the globe.

"I would like to congratulate all who have been involved in the development of this high-performance network connection," said Indiana University President Michael McRobbie. "In today's global marketplace, advanced computer networks have become essential, and through this new network connection, we can expect even greater levels of international participation in the advancement of education and research."

"This network connection is the result of the hard work of many people and groups from the U.S., Pakistan and the EU. It is now our responsibility to continue that hard work and cooperation as we transform this link into a valuable piece of international cyberinfrastructure," said James Williams, principal investigator, Indiana University.

Media Contacts
Lisa-Joy Zgorski, NSF (703) 292-8311 lisajoy@nsf.gov

Principal Investigators
James Williams, Indiana University 812-855-5742 william@indiana.edu

Related Websites
Trans-Eurasia Information Network: http://www.tein2.net/
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan: http://www.hec.gov.pk/
Indiana University Press Release: http://uitspress.iu.edu/news/page/normal/9124.html
US-Pakistan International Research and Education Network Connection project: http://www.pakistan.indiana.edu
European Commission Press Release: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1590&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=de

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering, with an annual budget of $6.06 billion. NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to over 1,900 universities and institutions. Each year, NSF receives about 45,000 competitive requests for funding, and makes over 11,500 new funding awards. NSF also awards over $400 million in professional and service contracts yearly.

 Read Original Article at : http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=112503

Useful NSF Web Sites:
NSF Home Page: http://www.nsf.gov
NSF News: http://www.nsf.gov/news/
For the News Media: http://www.nsf.gov/news/newsroom.jsp
Science and Engineering Statistics: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
Awards Searches: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/

MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 11/4/2008 1:56 AM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
Pakistanis pay most in South Asia to access Internet
 COLOMBO, Sept 16: Home to some 1.5 billion people, South Asia is paying a high price to access the Internet as service providers have been slow to deliver cheaper broadband connections, analysts say.

The region has embraced telephones, mobile phones and computers and India has a flourishing software and outsourcing industry, noted industry watchers at the first South Asia Broadband Congress said here earlier this month.

But South Asia has lagged behind in hopping onto the broadband bandwagon, observed Sanjay Gupta of India’s Midas Communication Technology.

“There is not enough local language content and affordable connections.

Currently, broadband penetration is very low — estimated to be less than three per cent in the region — and it boils down to cost,” Gupta said.

Home users in Pakistan pay the most in the region, with annual broadband prices of 2,660 dollars, followed by Bangladesh at 2,066 dollars, according to Colombo-based LIRNEasia, a regional telecom think-tank.

The same service costs 242 dollars in Sri Lanka, 223 dollars in India and 112 dollars in Maldives, said researchers at LIRNEasia, who are studying reasons for poor broadband penetration in South Asia.

In March, India logged 40 million Internet subscribers, which included 2.3 million broadband users, according to India’s Department of Telecommunications.

“India needs to target 100 million broadband users by 2015 to connect homes in remote villages. To do that, operators must bring down prices,” said Professor Ashok Jhunjhunwala of the Indian Institute of Technology.

“Rural broadband expansion throughout South Asia will help in education, provide remote healthcare and promote call centres in villages so computer literate people will not be forced to migrate to urban areas,” he said.

However, telecommunications operators need to cooperate to make broadband economically viable in developing countries, said Mallikarjun Rao, a director at Canadian telecoms giant Nortel Ltd.

“To leapfrog to the next generation, dominant operators must allow other operators access to its telephone exchanges — so-called local loop unbundling,” Roa said.

“The local loop is the crucial link between telephone exchanges and homes,” he said.

Unbundling the local loop or sharing the copper wire allows other operators to plug their equipment into the telephone exchange and offer faster services.

Holding back the development of broadband in Sri Lanka, for instance, is the fact that the country only allows the dominant operator, state-run Sri Lanka Telecom, to lay copper.

There are just under 40,000 broadband customers among Sri Lanka’s 19.5 million inhabitants, according to Sri Lanka Telecom.

Figures for broadband users in other South Asian countries were not available but officials at the conference said penetration was low.

“Right now, many people don’t have much of a choice when it comes to broadband” as the monopoly on laying wire to homes and offices remains with Sri Lanka Telecom, said Rohan Samarajiva, LIRNEAsia’s executive director.

“There should be more serious policy and regulatory attention for broadband infrastructure in the region, to make services more affordable,” he said.—AFP
MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 9/17/2007 10:21 AM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
WiMax service to be launched countrywide next month

ISLAMABAD (August 13 2007): WiMax service, a high-speed wireless telephone and internet facility, will be launched nation-wide next month for the first time in the country, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) Chairman Shahzada Alam Malik said on Thursday.

"The infrastructure developed for Wimax Service in Pakistan is the biggest in the world," he said while speaking at a mobile phone company's license extension ceremony here.

The PTA Chairman said the Wireless Local Loop (WLL) license holders in 3.5 GHz frequency have now established their networks using WiMax technology after issuance of commencement certificates by the Authority.

Shahzada Alam said the Authority has issued the certificates to Buraq Telecom, Wateen Telecom and MyTel to start their operations across the country next month.

The rest of the WLL operators holding spectrum in the 3.5 GHz were also in the planning stage while DV Com was also holding WLL license in all 14 telecom regions, he said.

"The networks developed by these companies have been checked and all the commencement certificates have been issued after thorough evaluation by the concerned authorities," he said.

The mobile operators such as Mobilink are also expected to join the WiMax market in the future. China's ZTE Corp has built a pre-WiMax trial network comprising one six-sector Base Transceiver Station (BTS) and 17 CPEs (Customer Premises Equipment) for Telecard.

The infrastructure put in place by various companies is a milestone in the spread of WiMax, a super-fast wireless technology that has a range of up to 30 miles and can deliver broadband at a theoretical maximum of 75 megabits per second. The 802.16-2004 standard, which is used in fixed WiMax networks, is being skipped in favour of a large-scale introduction of 802.16e, which was only recently agreed upon by the WiMax Forum.

MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 8/12/2007 10:15 PM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
Stepping up to Wireless ?

 

Let  CyberInI  help make the transition to Industrial Wireless Communications

Thinking back, it has not always been possible, practical, or cost effective to run network cables to every device, sensor or roving unit on the factory floor. Today's wireless technologies can eliminate physical and cost barriers, offering a new world of remote communication solutions. Reliable, on-demand communication with control and monitoring down to the individual embedded machine-level sensor is becoming possible with wireless.

As wireless network equipment emerges, interest in the use of wireless within industrial environments has surged. But navigating and understanding the technical aspects of the various technologies and standards is essential in the selection of suitable wireless equipment for your application.

Selecting the right technology and equipment will ultimately lead to a successfully installed, well-designed, reliable and efficient communication system. The following diagram and chart offers insight into the different wireless standards and applications best suited for each of the new Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN), Local Area (WLAN) and Metropolitan Area (WMAN) Networks applications. These include wireless standards and acronyms such as: 802.15.4 and ZigBee, 802.1a and Bluetooth, WUSB, Proprietary Radio Modems, 802.11 and Wi-Fi and finally 802.16 and WiMAX.

Wireless PAN / LAN / MAN Technologies

Standards & Characteristics
802.15.4
& Zigbee
Wireless
USB
Proprietary
Radio Modems
802.1a
Bluetooth
802.11x
Wi-Fi
802.16
WMAN WiMAX
Operation Frequency
868 MHz,
902-982 MHz,
2.4 GHz
2-11 GHz
900 MHz,
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz

b/g - 2.4 GHz
a - 5.0 GHz

2-11 GHz
Data Rate
20 kbps,
40 kbps,
250 kbps
480 Mbps
9.6 kbps,
19.2 kbps,
115 kbps
1 Mbps
11 Mbps,
54 Mbps
100-500 Mbps
Distance
10-50m
10m
100m, 30km
10m - 100m
b/g - 100m
a - 50m
50 km
Networking
ad hoc, static,
peer-to-peer
point-to-point
peer-to-peer
point-to-point
point-to-multipoint
ad hoc,
pico net
point-to-multipoint
point-to-point
Complexity
low
low
medium
medium
high
medium
Power Consumption
very low
low
medium
medium
high
high

As the wireless technologies and equipment continue to evolve, CyberInI remains committed to be the technology leader and offer best-in-class equipment for industrial applications. End-to-End solutions with CyberInI wired and wireless components have proven themselves in the tough world of the factory floor where reliability and cost effective network communication are vital.
——————————————————-

MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 3/19/2007 12:26 AM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
802.11 Basics

Wireless LAN Configurations

Currently, most wireless networks (WLANs) are based on the IEEE 802.11b, 802.11a or 802.11g standards. These standards define how to wirelessly connect computers or devices to a network. Wireless enabled devices send and receive data indoors and out, anywhere within the range of a wireless access point.

The choice of standard depends on your requirements, including data communications speed and range, the level of security, noise and interference concerns, compatibility issues and cost.

  • 802.11b was the first 802.11 standard to be released and have commercial products available. Also called Wireless Fidelity, or Wi-Fi, it has a range suitable for use in big office spaces. Wi-Fi is currently the most popular and least expensive wireless LAN specification. It operates in the unlicensed 2.4 GHz radio spectrum and can transmit data at speeds up to 11 Mbps within a 30m range. It can be affected by interference from mobile phones and Bluetooth devices which can reduce transmission speeds.
  • 802.11a has a couple of advantages over Wi-Fi. It operates in a less-populated (but also unlicensed) frequency band (5.15GHz to 5.35GHz) and is therefore less prone to interference. Its bandwidth is much higher than 802.11b, with a theoretical peak of 54 Mbps. However, actual throughput is typically closer to 25 Mbps.
  • 802.11g is the latest standard and promises to be the most popular format. It combines the speed the 802.11a and backward compatibility with 802.11b. It operates in the same frequency band as 802.11b but consequently also can be affected by interference.

The following table provides some comparative communications distances at various data communications speeds for each of the 802.11 standards.

Table 1. 802.11 a, b, g Range Comparison


Data Rate
(Mbps)
802.11a Range
(40 mW with 6dBi gain diversity patch antenna)
802.11g Range
(30 mW with 2.2 dBi gain diversity dipole antenna)
802.11g Range
(100 mW with 2.2 dBi gain diversity dipole antenna)
54
13 m
27 m
-
48
15 m
29 m
-
36
19 m
30 m
-
24
26 m
42 m
-
18
33 m
54 m
-
12
39 m
64 m
-
11
-
48 m
45 m
9
45 m
76 m
-
6
50 m
91 m
-
5.5
-
67 m
67 m
2
-
82 m
82 m
1
-
124 m
124 m


The following table provides information on data rates for each standard. Note that 802.11g systems operate significantly faster when there are no 802.11b clients in the network.

Table 2. 802.11a, b, g Data Rate Comparison

Data Rate
(Mbps)
Throughput
(Mbps)
Throughput as a % of 802.11b thoughput
802.11 b
11
6
100%
802.11g
(with .11b clients in cell)
54
14
233%
802.11g
(no .11b clients in cell)
54
22
367%
802.11a
54
25
417%


Basic Wireless Network Topology

When upgrading to a wireless network the overall layout can be a bit confusing. In the figure below we can see a typical wired client/server network setup including a network hub or (more often in modern networks) switch, a dedicated server, PC and a serial device connected to the network via a serial server. This is referred to as a wired infrastructure configuration.



Figure 1. Wired Infrastructure Network Configuration

A simpler wired network configuration (shown below) dispenses with the server and only consists of computers and other networked devices connected via their Ethernet interfaces through the hub or switch. This configuration is called wired peer to peer network.


Figure 2. Peer to Peer Configuration

To give either of these existing networks wireless capability, connect a wireless access point (AP) to the network switch as shown in figure below. Laptop or desktop computers equipped with wireless cards, or other wireless devices such as wireless serial servers, communicate with each other and the wired network via the AP. Wireless devices connect to the switch as if they are connected via a normal network cable. A major benefit to adding the wireless segment is that you can avoid running new cables. Another is that you can add up to 32 wireless computer users without having to buy a bigger switch with more ports.



Figure 3. Infrastructure Wireless Network

Wireless devices also can be set up as a peer to peer, or Ad Hoc, network configuration, as shown below.



Figure 4. Adhoc Wireless Network

Extending the Range

WLANs have a flexible architecture. You can easily extend the range and allow seamless roaming between APs. The preferred setup method for roaming within the office environment is to install multiple APs with the same Service Set Identifier (SSID) and security settings, however with each on a unique channel. 802.11 has three truly unique channels: 1, 6 and 11. You can spread out the APs in an overlapping channel layout as shown below:



Figure 5. Extending Range

802.11 Authentication & Encryption Security Basics

Like installing locks and keys on a door to control entry, wireless LAN security is designed to control which users can access the wireless LAN. The following table provides a summary of various WLAN security protocols and techniques.

Table 3. Security Types available for 802.11

Data Protection Technology
Description
WEP
Wired Equivalency Privacy, the original security standard for wireless LANs, easily exploited by software that can break the encryption after capturing traffic and recognizing encryption patterns.
802.1X
802.1X is the IEEE standard for wired and wireless LAN access control. It provides a means of authenticating and authorizing devices attached to a LAN. 802.1X defines the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP). EAP uses a central authentication server to authenticate each network user. EAP also has some vulnerabilities.
LEAP
Lightweight Extensible Authentication Protocol (LEAP), developed by Cisco, is based on the 802.1X authentication framework but addresses several weaknesses using dynamic WEP and sophisticated key management. LEAP also adds MAC address authentication.
PEAP
Protected Extensible Authentication Protocol (PEAP) provides secure transport of authentication data, including passwords and encryption keys. With PEAP, wireless clients can be authenticated without certificates, simplifying the secure wireless LAN architecture.
WPA
Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) is a subset of the 802.11i security standard and is expected to replace WEP. WPA combines Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) and 802.1X for dynamic key encryption and mutual authentication.
TKIP
Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) is part of the IEEE 802.11i encryption standard. TKIP provides per-packet key mixing, a message integrity check, and a re-keying mechanism, fixing the flaws of WEP.
WPA2
WPA2 is second generation WPA, providing Wi-Fi users a high level of assurance that only authorized users can access their wireless networks. WPA2 is based on the final IEEE 802.11i amendment to the 802.11 standard.

Default Security Settings

To provide basic authentication, most APs support simple MAC address filtering. Default security values are built-in and, in most cases, the AP implements these values on power up. However, you may want to make changes. Typically the following three parameters are configurable:

  • SSID – The Service Set Identifier will normally default to the manufacturer's name. You can set it to any word or phrase you like.
  • Channel – Normally the channel setting will default to channel 6. However, if a nearby neighbor is also using an access point and it is set to channel 6, there can be interference. Choose any other channel between 1 and 11. An easy way to see if your neighbors have access points is to use the search feature that comes with your wireless card.
  • WEP Key – WEP is disabled by default. To turn it on you must enter a WEP key and turn on 128-bit encryption.

Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)

WEP is the original security protocol for WLANs, defined in the 802.11 standard. WEP was the only encryption available on early 802.11 devices and is not an industrial security algorithm. Although simple to implement, WEP is easily hacked. Significant security improvements can be made simply by implementing two options built in to the Access Point: MAC address filtering and hiding the SSID. These measures will stop unwanted traffic from accidental intrusion and casual hackers, but are not sufficient for sensitive data or mission-critical networks.

Lightweight Extensible Authentication Protocol (LEAP)

LEAP is a proprietary authentication solution that is based on 802.1X but adds proprietary elements of security. The standard was developed by Cisco and, although implementation is simple, it shares some weaknesses with WEP and should not be used if high security is required for your configuration.

LEAP helps eliminate security vulnerabilities through the use of the following techniques

  • Mutual Authentication – The client must authenticate the network and the network needs to authenticate the client.
  • User-Based Authentication – LEAP eliminates the possibility of an unauthorized user access the network through a preauthorized piece of equipment by the use of usernames and passwords.
  • Dynamic WEP Keys – LEAP uses 802.1X to continually generate unique WEP keys for each user.

Protected Extensible Authentication Protocol (PEAP)

PEAP is a flexible security scheme that creates an encrypted SSL/TLS (Secure Sockets Layer / Transport Layer Security) channel between the client and the authentication server, and the channel then protects the subsequent user authentication exchange. To create the secure channel between client and authentication server, the PEAP client first authenticates the PEAP authentication server using digital certificate authentication. When the secure TLS channel has been established, you can select any standard EAP-based user authentication scheme for use within the channel.

After the user is successfully authenticated, dynamically generated keying material is supplied by the authentication server to the wireless AP. From this keying material, the AP creates new encryption keys for data protection.

Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP)

TKIP is part of the IEEE 802.11i encryption standard for WLANs and is the next generation of WEP. It enhances WEP by adding a per-packet key mixing function, a message integrity check and a re-keying mechanism. TKIP encryption replaces WEP’s small (40-bit) static encryption key, manually entered on wireless APs and client devices, with a 128 bit per-packet key. TKIP significantly mitigates WEP’s vulnerabilities but does not provide complete resolution for its weaknesses.

Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA)

WPA was introduced as a subset of the 802.11i security standard based on TKIP. WPA addresses the weaknesses of WEP with the dynamic encryption scheme provided by TKIP. WPA dynamically generates keys and removes the predictability that intruders rely on to exploit the WEP key. WPA also includes a Message Integrity Check (MIC), designed to prevent anattacker from capturing, altering and resending data packets.

Table 4. WPA and WPA2 Mode Types

WPA
WPA2
Authentication
Encryption
Authentication
Encryption
Enterprise Mode
(Business and Government)
IEEE 802.1X/EAP
TKIP/MIC
IEEE 802.1X/EAP
AES-CCMP
Personal Mode
(SOHO/personal)
PSK
TKIP/MIC
PSK
AES-CCMP

Wi-Fi Protected Access 2 (WPA2)

Launched in September 2004 by the Wi-Fi Alliance, WPA2 is the certified interoperable version of the full IEEE 802.11i specification which was ratified in June 2004. Like WPA, WPA2 supports IEEE 802.1X/EAP authentication or PSK technology. The authentication method used depends on whether Personal Mode or Enterprise Mode is being implemented. Encryption is the same in both modes. The encryption mechanism is the Counter-Mode/CBC-MAC Protocol (CCMP) called the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). AES satisfies U.S. government security requirements.

When a user associates with an access point, WPA2 mutual authentication process is initiated. The AP blocks access to the network until the user provides the appropriate credentials. The mutual authentication process ensures that only authorized users can gain access to the network. It also ensures that the client is connecting to an authorized server. If the user’s credentials are accepted by the authentication server, the client is admitted to the WLAN.

————————————————————————————-

MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 3/19/2007 12:21 AM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
Technical Notes

802.11 for Industrial Applications

IEEE 802.11 Application Notes

Wireless networking is catching the attention of a lot of people these days. Its impact is growing and spreading out from its early focus on office network applications into a host of other areas. In the industrial data communications space wireless local area networks (WLANs) are attracting attention in a similar way that wired Ethernet LANs did, albeit more quickly. Once Ethernet technology became commonplace, reliable and affordable, the industrial market started looking at it more seriously, considering how it could meet the unique and often stringent requirements of industrial applications.

Of course, proprietary wireless systems (point-to-point and networked) have been around for a while, but cost, lack of standardization and performance limitations have been an impediment to their range of implementation. As the cost/performance ratio of IEEE 802.11 wireless (or Wi-Fi) has improved, manufacturers and users have begun to develop products and systems specifically for industrial applications.

Now users are looking to WLANs for solutions to a wider range of needs. Inexpensive, reliable wireless networks allow industrial users to enhance data collection, human-machine interfaces (HMI) and web-based system monitoring, programming and management. The ability to implement new projects without the time and expense of running cables is a compelling proposition. Maintenance departments can readily see the value in providing mobile access for updating, reprogramming and re-calibrating equipment over a wireless network.


Basics of the IEEE 802.11 Standard

IEEE 802.11 is a set of standards (first introduced in 1997) that defines how multiple devices can communicate on a wireless network. The standard has grown into a set of several standards with alphabetical suffixes that (as of this writing) extend from a to v. The standard defines the physical and data link layers only. As a part of the IEEE family of standards, it is not surprising that 802.11 WLANs are easily connected to 802.3 (Ethernet) LANs. Higher layer LAN protocols, network operating systems and internetworking protocols such as TCP/IP integrate seamlessly.

Under the IEEE 802.11 standard there can be two different types of devices on the network: stations and access points. For wireless office networks a station is usually a desktop PC equipped with a wireless network interface card (NIC) or a portable computer with built in Wi-Fi or a PCMCIA Wi-Fi card added. For industrial applications the range of possibilities is wider. For example, a station could be a Wi-Fi enabled PDA (personal digital assistant) used as an HMI. Another possibility is an 802.11 wireless serial server connected directly to a programmable logic controller (PLC), HMI, or other field device.

An 802.11 access point is a radio with an interface that allows connection to a wired LAN. Access points run bridging software (specified by 802.11d) to facilitate the connection from wireless to wired network. The access point becomes the base station for the WLAN. It aggregates access to the wired network for multiple wireless stations. An access point could be a standalone device or a card in a PC.

Wireless Network Configurations

The 802.11 standard defines two modes of operation: infrastructure mode and ad hoc mode. Infrastructure mode makes use of one or more access points connected to a wired LAN. Wireless stations communicate with access points to gain access to each other and/or the LAN. In the Basic Service Set (BSS) several stations communicate with one access point, which is connected to a wired LAN. In the Extended Service Set (ESS) two or more access points connect to the LAN creating a subnetwork.

In ad hoc mode, also called Independent Basic Service Set (IBSS), access points are not used. Wireless stations communicate directly with each other in a peer-to-peer fashion. This mode allows individual computers to set up a network where wireless infrastructure does not exist.

The original physical layer specification of 802.11 defined a WLAN operating in the 2.4 GHz ISM band, which does not require FCC licensing. Three different options were specified: two using spread-spectrum radio and one using infrared. The infrared option never gained much traction. The radio options operate at 1 Mbps and 2 Mbps using frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) or direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) techniques. The two techniques are not interoperable and provide different performance characteristics. Frequency hopping has the advantage of providing better noise immunity but limits the top end data rate.


802.11b Raises the Bar

Networks based on the original 802.11 had the advantage of being based on a widely accepted standard, as opposed to earlier proprietary networks. But it quickly became clear that data rates of 1 to 2 Mbps were inadequate, especially when the goal was often to interconnect with Ethernet LANs that operated at 10 Mbps (10Base-T) and later 100 Mbps (100Base-TX). The 802.11b standard was the first attempt to address these data rate limitations. The result was a standard that, like the original specification, utilizes the 2.4 GHz band, but achieves data rates as high as 11 Mbps, bringing it into the same range as 10BaseT.

IEEE 802.11b implements the same DSSS modulation scheme used for one mode of 802.11, but dropped the FHSS mode because of inherent data rate limitations. Although FHSS provided superior noise immunity for 802.11, the newer standard compensates by incorporating several other modulation and coding schemes that ensure good noise immunity. One of these is dynamic rate shifting, which causes it to fallback to lower data rates to compensate for higher noise levels.


IEEE 802.11g Steps Up

IEEE 802.11g takes a big step forward without cutting ties to its siblings. The standard specifies a WLAN that operates on the 2.4 GHz band at data rates as high as 54 Mbps, but is backward compatible with the earlier standard. It incorporates at least two modes of operation, one that is compatible with the slower 802.11b and another that operates at the higher data rate. Systems can incorporate 802.11b and 802.11g equipment and they will interoperate. However, when connected into the same network the 802.11g equipment will operate at the 11 Mbps limitation of the 802.11b equipment. To overcome this problem separate b and g networks can be created and linked together through a router or access point (if it is equipped with the necessary capabilities). This keeps slower 802.11b traffic separate and allows the 802.11g WLAN to operate at the higher data rate.


IEEE 802.11a an Alternative

Another member of the 802.11 family—the 802.11a version—takes a slightly different approach by operating in the 5 GHz band. Like the 2.4 GHz band, 5 GHz does not require licensing and has the added advantage of being less congested. The maximum data rate for 802.11a is 54 Mbps, the same as for 802.11g. While 802.11a WLANs have some advantages, the downside is that they are not directly compatible with the b and g versions. In order to connect 802.11a to either of the other networks special bridging equipment must be used.


The 802.11 Data Link Layer

Like 802.3 (Ethernet), the 802.11 data link layer is made up of two sub-layers: the Logical Link Control (LLC) sub-layer and the Media Access Control (MAC) sub-layer. Both 802.3 and 802.11 use the same LLC, specified by 802.2, one reason why integrating 802.11 and 802.3 networks is relatively simple. The 802.11 MAC sub-layer is also similar but does different in the way the shared radio carrier is accessed. While Ethernet uses Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD), 802.11 uses a variation called Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA).

In CSMA/CA a station that intends to transmit ‘listens’ for traffic on the radio carrier frequency and sends if it is clear after a random delay period. If the receiving station receives the packet intact it sends an acknowledgement (ACK) to confirm the packet has been received. If the transmitting station does not receive an ACK it assumes a collision occurred and transmits again after a random delay period.

Another aspect of the 802.11 data link layer that is different than Ethernet is the use of a packet fragmentation and CRC error checking with each packet. Ethernet implements these functions at higher protocol layers whereas 802.11 fragments packets and uses CRC at the data link layer. This allows the WLAN to send smaller packets that are less likely to be corrupted by interference, decreasing the need for re-transmissions.


802.11 Range, Security and Other Considerations

IEEE 802.11 devices communicate via radio signals that must penetrate solid objects to reach other network nodes. These signals are attenuated to varying degrees depending on the type of material and its thickness. The transmitter power output, the type of antenna used and the amount of attenuation through materials affects the useable range. Other factors also affect range and overall performance. Electromagnetic noise, the amount of network traffic, other radio devices operating in the same frequency band (e.g. portable phones, etc) and reflections (multipathing) are factors. In an infrastructure network the number of access points and their coverage pattern also affect how well the system operates. Typically an 802.11 device operating indoors will have a range from 100 feet minimum to about 500 feet maximum. Outdoors, some products, using high gain antennae may achieve line-of-sight ranges of five miles or more.

Security is a significant concern for WLAN users, and industrial users are not exempt. Whether security threats originate intentionally or unintentionally, wireless systems are more susceptible than wired systems. IEEE 802.11b uses Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) protocol to encrypt transmitted data. Designed to provide the same level of security as that of a wired LAN, WEP operates at the physical and data link layers of the network and has been found to be somewhat lacking. IEEE 802.11g originally implemented a more robust security standard called Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA), a scheme designed to improve on WEP’s limitations. It has better encryption algorithms and uses a technique called authentication. WPA was considered an interim standard. IEEE’s 802.11i standard (which was adopted recently) incorporates WPA as well as additional security features. It is expected to replace WPA.


Industrial Applications Challenge WLANs

Applying WLANs to industrial applications presents added challenges compared with home or enterprise applications. Industrial environments often produce significant amounts of electrical noise. Variable frequency drives, competing radio systems, radar and microwave sources and welders are a few examples of industrial noise sources. Signal attenuation and reflections also can compromise signal coverage in industrial buildings and worksites. Transmitter power levels, receiver sensitivity and access point placement is critical. Reliability of individual components and the overall system can affect plant safety, security and downtime costs. Industrial users demand performance guarantees. These guarantees extend to system characteristics such as data latency and corruption levels.

In response, many manufacturers are marketing equipment designed to address these challenges. For example, stations and access points targeting the industrial market implement higher transmitter power levels. Industrially focused equipment increasingly offers weatherproof enclosures, industrial mounting options and connectors and other robust features. Manufacturers often include software to perform RF site surveys to assess the consistency and reliability of plant coverage. Some access points include remote management software.

The list of 802.11 modems, serial servers, repeaters, access points and other equipment grows daily. Quality and ruggedness continues to improve. At the same time the 802.11 standard continues to evolve while maintaining backward compatibility. Industrial equipment manufacturers and users are embracing wireless networking in concept and practice, and finding success in the process. IEEE 802.11 compliant WLANs are a key part of that trend.

———————————————————————————————

Introduction to DSL

INFORMATION ON DSL

DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) A group of standards for Broadband Network Connections over regular phone lines.

TYPES OF DSL:

• ADSL – Asymmetric DSL • HDSL – High Bit-Rate-DSL • IDSL – IDSN over DSL • RADS – Rate Adaptive DSL • SDSL – Symmetric DSL • VDSL – Very High Bit-Rate DSL • DSL lite • G.SHDSL- Single Pair High-Speed DSL

ADSL (Asymmetric DSL) Where the up and down bandwidths are given different quantities of bandwidth. A typical configuration may be 128KB up and 2MB down.

HDSL (High Bit-Rate DSL) A type of DSL not commonly used.

IDSL (ISDN over DSL) Uses 144KB as a standard for DSL. IDSL is used where there is no availability of other types of DSL, such as ADSL.

RADSL (Rate Adaptive DSL) Can be termed as a variant of Asymmetric DSL whereby the speed of the DSL connection can be adjusted. This is dependent on the distance from the Central Office (CO) and the quality of the connection.

SDSL (Symmetric DSL) Is termed as a type of DSL whereby the up and down speeds are set to the same bandwidth. Usually operates at 1.5 Mbps up and down. Not as common as ADSL.

VDSL (Very High Bit-Rate DSL) A TYPE OF Asymmetric DSL designed to work at very high speeds. At a distance of 1000 feet from the CO it will work at down speeds of 55Mbps. This is significantly reduced at longer distances from the CO.

DS Lite This places the DSL splitter at the Telco CO instead of the customer’s residence. A type of Asymmetric DSL.

G.HDSL (Single-Pair High Speed DSL) A type of DSL operating to ITU standard G.991. Supports Asymmetric speeds from 192 Kbps – 2304 Kbps on a single line pair and 384 Kbps – 4608 Kbps over two pair.

DSL Splitters Some DSL applications move data traffic along the same pair of lines which carry voice traffic. Other DSL applications move data traffic along a dedicated wire pair. Nearly all US homes have two pairs of lines from the local telephone provider. If a home uses only one telephone line then the DSL can be installed on the other pair. If both phone lines are being used the DSL line will have to share traffic with voice. This is achieved by using a splitter. A DSL splitter is a box that attaches to the wire pair which then splits it into two separate pairs. That is one for voice and one for DSL traffic.

===================

 

MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 3/19/2007 12:09 AM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
CyberInI Mission Statement
Mission statement:To provide innovative solutions and services to our customers while using latest and greatest technologies:a) Internet Service Providerb) IT Network & Maintenancec) Technical Support & ServicesAs we all know that the Internet has become the strongest media in the world today. People all over the world, are using this technology to give maximum benefits to their business. Internet has proved itself as one of the most effective and strongest medium of communication whether it's being used to stay connected with your clients or advertising and promoting your products and services throughout the world.In today's world internet access with no ...
MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 3/7/2007 12:00 AM | View Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
GBM kicks off operations in Pakistan
KARACHI (January 25 2007): Gulf Business Machines (GBM) on Wednesday initiated its operations in Pakistan to provide IT solution. Addressing the launching ceremony, CEO, GBM, Cesare Cardone said that Pakistan was a potential and growing IT market and hoped it would further get augmentation in the same field in future.

On the occasion, Managing Director, International Office Products (IOP) Syed M Sani, Country General Manager IBM Pakistan, Humayun Bashir were present. He said GBM's primary objective was to facilitate the customer, in addition to providing employment opportunities in Pakistan. He said "GBM had acquired the IBM, Symantec, Networking and associated services portion of IOP business.

IOP is a well-established IT company in Pakistan with a 22-year history of success.

To a question, he replied that GBM's aim was not the transfer of technology to Pakistan but it would function as a solution provider. It has been incorporated in Karachi a few weeks ago and now IOP professionals operating in the part of IOP operation that match the GBM business model will move to GBM and will become the first nucleus of GBM Pakistan employees, he added.

He pointed out that the gulf business model would be implemented in Pakistan. It will provide a full range of offerings to its clients including expertise and skilled resources available within GBM group, in conjunction with local team from IOP. GBM Pakistan will have operations in Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad.

MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 1/30/2007 1:24 AM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
Pakistan appearing on IT's world map'
KARACHI (January 26 2007): Pakistan is coming on the international map especially in the realms of IT for the past few years. The Country General Manager of IBM Pakistan, Humayun Bashir, said. He was speaking at the launching of the GBM at a local hotel on Wednesday.

Humayun Bashir said Pakistan is coming on the international map owing to the steady GDP growth of six to seven percent which the country has achieved as well as its foreign exchange reserves besides and better governance today. He was of the view that the journey is more or less reasonably clear in terms of improving the governance process.

The IBM Pakistan chief pointed out that this is the result of the stability and the growth that the companies like the GBM, banking sector and others are interested in Pakistan. He said that Pakistan has seen foreign direct investment (FDI) in excess of three billion dollars a year on average.

This should go up to five billion dollars next year in Pakistan not just in the field of IT, telecom or banking but we are seeing a lot of investment in the energy as well as the construction sector. Humayun Bashir said that some of the initial movers are our brothers and friends from the Middle East. He said that this started with the PTCL, Bank Al Falah, United Bank, Faysal Bank, Union Bank.

Copyright Associated Press of Pakistan, 2007
MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 1/26/2007 11:30 PM | View Comments (2) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)
Pakistan may cross $1 billion IT export in three years
LAHORE (January 10 2007): Pakistan has started receiving global inquiries on IT services and software exports which increased from $30 million US $300 million during the last three years. It is likely to cross $1 billion mark in the next three years.

The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) reported $75 million software exports last year. The figures do not include the amount received through informal exports. Chairman and Chief Executive of NetSol Technology, Salim Ghauri expressed these views while talking to Business Recorder on Tuesday.

India, however, estimates the total volume of IT service exports made formally and informally and even the services provided by the US and Europe- based Indians. Salim Ghauri was optimistic about a significant increase in the software exports from Pakistan. He said that once the target of one billion dollar is achieved, the next billion would be easy.

For the first time, the Western countries are considering Pakistan for IT services after China and India. Achievement of CMMI Level-5, the best standard award by NetSol Technology enabled Pakistan to be recognised in the world for IT service, he said.

He further said that IT was gaining momentum rapidly in the country. He urged Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz to declare 2008 as an 'IT year' to promote information technology in the country. The government has announced to observe 2007 as 'Tourism Year' to attract tourists. The earning of any individual working in the IT sector is substantially high as compared to other sectors, therefore, the government should attach priority to IT promotion to enable Pakistan to exploit the existing potential, he maintained.

Talking about the company's performance, Salim said that NetSol Technology was given the best performance award and has earned foreign exchange worth Rs395 million and if business carried by NetSol TIG, the sister company of NetSol Technology is included the figures would 500 million.

He was of the view that the youth in small cities are talented and intelligent but lacking communication skills. If facilities of IT education are provided at local level, they could play vital role in the uplift of the country's economy, he maintained.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007
MORE >>
Posted by CyberInI at 1/26/2007 11:25 PM | View Comments (0) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (0)